Ah, what a wonderful voice the great preacher had ;)
Ah, what a wonderful voice the great preacher had ;)
Ah, what a wonderful voice the great preacher had ;)
Jonathan’s doing again what he does best. Stirring! This time he tackles the myth that preaching in NZ is bad. Suggesting sensibly that Kiwi preachers are probably on average no worse that any other nationality. Which is doubtless a huge comfort to all you Kiwi preachers, but must be a real worry to the rest of the world ;)
OK, crude rude and highly unfair joke out of the way, Jonathan’s stirring slags off several groups I belong to:
JR’s practical advice in the post: The Social Location of the Preacher and the Blame Game is aimed at all three of me:
1. If you are a biblical preacher teach your congregation what biblical preaching is and how to train their preachers in it and let them train you! (and make sure you are actively training others)
Yes, yes, yes, that’s right. I’ve learnt heaps about preaching from the people at Balmoral Baptist Church over the last 18 years, and quite a bit from other people I’ve preached or ministered to elsewhere too. I hope I’ve also (often, maybe even usually) modeled decent preaching, and faithful, sensible approaches to biblical hermeneutics also…
2. If you are an academic adopt a different preacher each year, be nice to them and encourage them in their preaching of scripture.
I am sorry, I’m not arrogant enough to go out and “adopt” a preacher, but I do try to talk (to anyone who shows the slightest evidence of interest) about what I think makes a good sermon. And over the years I’ve also written in the NZ Baptist a number of rants on the subject, from an early castigation of the blasphemy of “relevance” when it takes priority over real biblical content, to a more recent claim that I could sum up good preaching in one word: sharp.
3. If you are a frustrated congregant pray for your pastor and talk to him or her gently but matter of factly about what is missing from the sermons.
The praying and talking make sense, but “what is missing from the sermons”! You’re joking Jonathan, surely? I wouldn’t attend one of those “Christian” entertainment centres where the preacher fails to make an attempt to proclaim the word from Scripture, so nothing “is missing from the sermons”. The problem is the opposite. Almost every sermon I hear would be twice as effective if it were half as long.
To cure that problem all you need to do, preachers, is spend an extra hour preparing. And most of you can easily save several, since you spend too long already “crafting” your words. Instead cut ruthlessly till all that is left is the essential message. Done :)
Actually there is one serious confession, and one (other) serious piece of advice I’d offer:
This post follows my Theological education: some autobiographical reflections: Childhood.
I arrived at University determined to use the opportunity of life away from home to explore existence without God or church. I was studying psychology, keen to see how the scientific method, with its empirical and experimental openness, could throw light on the mystery of human behaviour. However, despite my intentions, by a series of random events, or through divine providence (you decide), I ended up agreeing to attend the Baptist Students’ Group’s opening meeting. Well, at least there’d be free food, and more women than men :)
I found a bunch of late-sixties student radicals. They questioned things I’d never dreamed of examining, tested everything intending only to retain what stood the test. Within days I was reading the (then popular) “death of God theologians”. What nonsense, the divinity whose death they were gleefully if sadly admitting was not God, but merely a god. Those little convenient powers that humans invent, keep in their back pockets in case they will be useful on rainy days, and then discard when umbrellas are invented. This wasn’t God. Through reading deeply of the “death of God” I discovered I was a latent, if confused, theist. And worse, that God had his claws in me, and I could not escape in any of the (then) usual ways. I was hooked, and the shape of my future life (all unknowingly to me at the time) was foreordained.
But first I had to learn about sectarianism and about the church…
HT Mary Hesse Tensegrities:
This is my third contribution to the mission trips conversation. This particular conversation (and there are/have been of course many earlier ones ;) was started by Vinoth Ramachandra’s post: Who Says “No” to “Mission Trips”? If you have not read that read it before reading on…
I was pointed to that post by y colleague Jonathan who offered a characteristically thought-through and rich metitation, so I responded here and here (I neglected to make explicit – for anyone who is a casual visitor here – that I have an interest to declare). Since writing those posts I have seen another response (from someone with a stronger declared interest) the Kouya Chronicle‘s “Short Term Mission Trips: Just Say No?”
On a lighter note Lingamish offers thoughts on Clownin’ for Jesus. And among the various comments to all these posts I found Judy’s particularly good at stating the case for good mission trips, so I’ll reproduce it here:
Tim, I agree with what you say, but I think there are some legitimate things that people can do in short term visits that are more than being tourists – they just shouldn’t be called “mission”.
It does. More than reasonable, it offers fine examples of the good that short term visits by rich-world Christians to other Christians can achieve. These good things should not be thrown away. I’m not asking for that. “Merely” stressing that people on such short term visits need to be prepared, appropriate people, and need also to understand that the goal is not so that they can give, so much as that they can learn. And all this needs to be achieved in ways which do not result in the sort of sadness that Vinoth Ramachandra describes so well. Anyone thinking of involvement in this “business” should read his post and have conversations along similar lines at both ends of the trip (starting point and destination). Such trips are not a “right” they are a privilege! They should be earned not by cash but by behaviour and through relationship.
PS: The always interesting William Black has added a (long but thoughtful) post: Short-Term Missions – Boon or Curse
The latest Tyndale Tech email just arrived. I do not usually repeat them here, I reckon if you are interested you subscribe! But this one has a much wider than usual potential readership. In it David Instone-Brewer of Tyndale House, Cambridge presents a pretty full list of the remarkable range of online or freely downloadable Bible study tools, and also highlights briefly the main ones to buy as well.
If you study the Bible, at any level at all from beginner to PhD there is likely to be something here for you that you did not know about! The range of superb online tools has grown so fast over the last few years, that it is now amazing what is available.
My daughter (in Glasgow as an exchange student) has been posting recently on Facebook about procrastination (it’s nearly the exam season there, and revision does not beckon like she thinks it should. Shopping, cooking, buying tickets… her list of procrastinatory activities are different from mine. But today I am procrastinating too!
I’m supposed to be polishing (off) a talk for tomorrow night on Song of Songs (I guess since I am the only person many people know who has preached on the Song I deserve the invitation ;) but that experience does not really make preparing to preach on the Song easy – so I procrastinate…
Actually this post is both related to the preparation (since the stimulus was seeing that Dale, who invited me to preach, uses a neat plugin to post from his blog to Facebook) and is actually useful – at least if this post appears in FB as well as on the blog.
Anyway enough procrastination, back to the Song of Songs.
Well, I’m busy with this week’s sermon, after the helpful comments on my post last week Helicopter gunships in Joel – a plea for help :) though none critiquing what I actually preached :( I am tempted to make this post too a plea for assistance ;)
Instead, I’ll just note that my theme is that “The Bible is Perspicuous” and I plan to illustrate the theme and turn what risked being a lecture back into a sermon by looking at Jehovah’s Witnesses, Scripture and Salvation…
I’m attaching the slides again, and any comments or suggestions would be welcome :)
I’ll also say, that despite the fervour with which guys (but not often women – I wonder why, are most women too sensible?) from the US of A debate the details of “inerrancy” I really find that concept – even when qualified into safety by someone as skillful and provocative as John Hobbins – quite cold and uninspiring – when wielded by a mouth-foaming hearty muscular Evangelical (usually with a very big E) it is just terrifying! By contrast “perspicuity” is a peacemaker, patient, kind and gentle, though with a heart of steel. Just think of Menno Simons saying:
The Word is plain and needs no interpretation: namely, thou shalt love the Lord thy God with all thy heart, with all thy soul, and with all thy strength, and thy neighbor as thyself. Mt. 22:37, 39. Again, you shall give bread to the hungry and entertain the needy. Is. 58:7
Who can claim to have mastered such a Scripture?
So, how did I preach about “Helicopter gunships in Joel“?
As I said, this was part of a series on “How to Read the Bible” and though the sermon was on Joel 2:5-8 the title was “The Bible is NOT a code book… the Bible means what it says“.
I’m uploading my presentation and an audio recording of the sermon (as whole “slides” rather than with some bullet points and images appearing sequentially to save bandwidth as I am using a borrowed connection this week, for the same rerason the audio is AMR rather than MP3) so you can get a feel for the sermon:
Basically I suggested:
The Bible is not a code book, but clear, it means what it says, and contains good news!
My problem is a variant of Lingamish’s, but with existential urgency. He asked about one sort of almost unpreachable text (the vengeance passages in the OT) whether he should not just cut the Gordian knot and hack them from Scripture. I am preaching this Sunday (tomorrow already :(
I have to preach on one of those passages where the vivid pictures cause people to read the Bible as a code book. You know, the helecopter gunships in Joel or the jewels in the priestly breastplate… passages preachers are tempted to read as coded messages. They are two a penny in some parts of the Bible.
My problem is pretty much the usual one, except my topic was announced last month “The Bible is NOT a codebook, it means what it says“. Great idea, right? But how does one of these passages work to preach it straight.
5 As with the rumbling of chariots,
they leap on the tops of the mountains,
like the crackling of a flame of fire devouring the stubble,
like a powerful army drawn up for battle.
6 Before them peoples are in anguish,
all faces grow pale.
7 Like warriors they charge,
like soldiers they scale the wall.
Each keeps to its own course,
they do not swerve from their paths.
8 They do not jostle one another,
each keeps to its own track;
they burst through the weapons and are not halted.Joel 2:5-8
Is not a prophecy of helecopter gunships in the 20th or 21st century, but of locusts and/or an invading Iron Age army then how is it good news for people in Blockhouse Bay tomorrow?
My problem has greaqter existential urgency as I have a church leadership retreat all day today, so only have a few hours for sermon prep tonight and tomorrow morning, so please help me!
How would YOU preach Exodus 26? Or the beginning of Joel 2?