11. Reading in the light of Christ

image_pdfimage_print

No blended fabrics for real Christians?

This last article may at first sight seem the simplest. Of course we read the Bible as people who know Jesus, and in the light of what we know of him. As Christians we could hardly do anything else! Yet, how we do it causes big arguments among us.

Those weird laws in Leviticus

Take the question of all those strange laws in Leviticus. It seems simple enough, people often say that the coming of Jesus has abolished the ritual and the civil laws of the Old Testament, while the ethical laws still apply to us. A closer look at the Bible (both OT and NT) shows this “simple” approach fails.

Firstly it involves arguing in a circle. In the Old Testament it is quite difficult to distinguish neatly between the three sorts of law. Take Leviticus 19, this chapter mixes the three sorts up together. It is clear that the “three sorts of law” was not a distinction the OT made. Or take one example, is Lev 19:19 ritual, civil or ethical law? Other laws that prohibit mixing things concern ritual, yet there is no ritual language here. Part of the verse concerns farming issues so perhaps we could classify it as civil law? It must be either civil or ritual law, because we don’t refuse to wear poly-cotton clothes, so it can’t be ethical law. (Notice the self-defeating circular argument!)

This approach to Jesus’ abolishing some OT law seems even more wrong when we turn to the NT. In Matt 5:17-18 (cf. Luke 16:17; James 2:10) Jesus says clearly: “Do not think that I have come to abolish the law or the prophets; I have come not to abolish but to fulfil. For truly I tell you, until heaven and earth pass away, not one letter, not one stroke of a letter, will pass from the law until all is accomplished.”

We cannot claim that Jesus abolishes any of these laws, because he himself tells us that he did not!

Jesus “fulfils”

The word Jesus uses to describe what he does to the Old Testament (and especially its law) is “fulfil”. What does this mean? It seems to imply that what was once a prediction comes true in Jesus. When they are talking about OT prophecies, this can seem to be what NT writers mean. So, in Matt 12:17, the Pharisees conspire against Jesus and he tells those he has healed not to announce his identity – Matthew comments that this fulfils Isaiah 42:1-3 (Matt12:17-21).

There are however clues that Jesus’ fulfilling means more than this. In Matt 2:15 the evangelist uses similar wording to point to Hos 11, but this passage is not a prophecy that foretells Jesus. It reads:

1“When Israel was a child, I loved him, and out of Egypt I called my son. 2But the more I called Israel, the further they went from me. They sacrificed to the Baals and they burned incense to images.

It is clearly speaking about Israel’s unfaithfulness to God, not Joseph being called back from Egypt, with Mary and Jesus. Matthew is pointing to a prediction but a parallel, and more to a filling out. Israel (thought of as God’s “son”) was “called” from Egypt by God, but was unfaithful. Jesus (the son of God) was called by God from Egypt, and was faithful. Jesus fills out fully (fulfils) the failed calling of Israel.

How Jesus fulfils the OT

Jesus fulfils all of the OT (see Luke 24:27), by filling out fully and making perfect what was imperfect there. This is what Jesus does with the OT laws in Matthew 5:17ff. After saying that he did not come to abolish them, Jesus goes on to talk about several OT laws. He talks about the 6th commandment in 5:21ff., he makes “do not kill” more perfect by telling his disciples not to be angry or insult! Likewise in 27ff. he fulfils the seventh commandment, speaking not merely of adultery, but of all sexual desire outside marriage.

If we understand “fulfil” like this we can see not only how Jesus fulfils all the laws, but also the stories. Take a “nasty” story like Jacob stealing his brother’s birthright (Gen 27). Jacob the ancestor of God’s people, Israel, was a liar and thief who claimed what was not his. Jesus by contrast:

6who, though he was in the form of God, did not regard equality with God as something to be exploited, 7 but emptied himself, taking the form of a slave, being born in human likeness. And being found in human form, 8 he humbled himself and became obedient to the point of death– even death on a cross. 9 Therefore God also highly exalted him… (Phil 2:6-9)

The final step

They say even the longest journey begins with a single step. The last step of our year-long journey in reading the Bible faithfully is simply this, to recognise how Jesus fills out fully (fulfils) what we read in Scripture. Whatever is partial, incomplete, adapted to the needs of broken sinful humans (cf. Matt 19:8). Jesus makes perfect, full and complete. If your understanding of what you read in the Bible does not match this fullness it has not been faithful to the Word of God revealed in Scripture.

This is the end of a journey, If you are interested in sharing this approach to Reading the Bible Faithfully with a group, and you would like Tim to help, you can contact him here or by email: tim@bigBible.org


   11 Comments


  1. Don Johnson
      December 11, 2014

    I see the main reason one cannot divide the Mosaic laws into 3 parts that are then handled differently is that a covenant is a unity and cannot be so divided. So I see one of the fundamental premises of so-called Reformed Covenant theology as a non-starter. In other words, I totally agree with your first section.

    After your first paragraph I thought you were going to point out that from the Mishnah one can see that the words destroy and fulfill have special meanings in 2nd temple Judaism, namely misinterpret and correctly interpret.

    On Matt 19:8 I see this being an example of God’s permissive will (as contrasted with God’s perfect will, which is that there would be no divorce because there would be no cause for divorce). Jesus is not changing any of this, but I do think Jesus is correcting seven misinterpretations of the Pharisees in this pericope.

    • Tim
        December 11, 2014

      Thanks for a very quick and informative comment. Probably that level of detail is beyond the target audience for these posts (“ordinary” people in Baptist churches in NZ who want to read the Bible faithfully but don’t want to really study to get there ;)

  2. Tim
      April 8, 2015

    Can I come back to your comment, (sorry so long has passed mum died in late December and I was distracted) while I haven’t been able to find discussion on your suggested mishnaic technical use of the terms (can you give me an accessible reference?) even assuming this I am still convinced Matthew’s gospel uses “fulfil” in the sort of ways I have outlined…

  3. Donald Johnson
      April 9, 2015

    http://www.amazon.com/Understanding-Difficult-Words-Jesus-Perspective/dp/156043550X/ref=asap_bc?ie=UTF8 is where I first learned about this possibility of fulfill and destroy being Hebrew idioms from the Mishnah. I also have found this in other books, but this was the first.

    In this understanding, “destroy the Law/Torah” means to misinterpret God’s instructions so that one will break them (the actual instructions) and to “fulfill the Law/Torah” means to correctly interpret God’s instructions so that one will (then be able to) keep them.

    • Tim
        April 10, 2015

      Thanks, and “bother”. The nearest library copy of the book is in Australia and it is not previewed on Googlebooks, and the Amazon preview is tantalising… did they give any references that I might be able to get at?

      • Donald Johnson
          April 11, 2015

        Of course, the primary source is the Jewish Mishnah. My take is this is the second most important book context to better understand the NT after the OT/Tanakh.

        • Tim
            April 11, 2015

          Indeed, but do you have a reference?

          • Donald Johnson
              September 11, 2015

            Yes, the book I mentioned above. But then I have found it elsewhere in other words.

  4. Anonymous
      April 12, 2017

    The food and festival laws, for example, most definitely ARE STILL IN FORCE. Please visit GracePlusLawKeepingSave.Us to discover plenty of evidence supporting the continued observance of some Old Testament laws.

    • Tim
        May 3, 2017

      I’m afraid, unless you claim Jesus was a liar, “some” will not do! In Matt 5:17ff. he clearly teaches that NOT ONE law has been done away with.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

%d bloggers like this: